Codex 5.2 or Opus 4.5: Which code model reigns supreme?

It's complicated. A recent Twitter poll asked developers whether Codex 5.2 or Opus 4.5 (with Claude Code) produces better results, and the answers are all over the map. No clear winner emerges. Here's the breakdown:

Some developers find Codex 5.2 to be a major time-saver. As @stokry_45 put it, "Codex saves so much time. Claude's definitely hit or miss." @programmerByDay echoed this sentiment, saying, "I don’t get all the hype around claude code."

However, Opus 4.5 has its champions, with @dariuszparys claiming it allows them to achieve desired results faster than Codex. Still, others advocate for a more nuanced approach. "You can’t survive without both," suggests @sphoebs. "They need to ping pong."

It's worth pointing out that nearly a quarter of respondents prefer Opus 4.5, indicating it's a strong contender despite perceived shortcomings. The small showing for "Opus 4.5 (with Claude Code) is better" seems to indicate users don't like the combination. It also seems that the right choice likely depends heavily on the specific task, individual coding style, and prompting techniques.

Ultimately, the best code model is the one that fits your workflow, so maybe experimenting is the key.