@GergelyOrosz asked on X
AI Divide: Hands-On Founders vs. Disengaged?
98 responses analyzed
Yep, a massive divide exists, according to a recent Twitter poll by @GergelyOrosz. The question explored the differences between startups where founders actively use AI tools and those where they don't. Here's a breakdown:
| Response | Percentage | Votes |
|---|---|---|
| Yes, there is a massive divide. | 36% | 35 |
| The AI tools (like Copilot) are 'meh'. | 5% | 5 |
| Group B (founder not engaged) will be left behind. | 4% | 4 |
| The gap isn't talent, it's exposure. Hands-on founders feel the leverage. | 7% | 7 |
| Copilot sucked so bad at launch tons of people still think AI is bad at code. | 1% | 1 |
| A >: | 3% | 3 |
Some interesting takes from the respondents:
- @abustamante: "Hands-on AI founder here. Most AI is meh (especially Copilot). The secret is not to get distracted with the million shitty models and to..."
- @ShaneSmitas: "Agreed. Hands-on founder and model fluency make a culture shift. Without it, devs treat AI like Copilot 1.0."
- @qualadder: "Copilot sucked so bad at launch tons of people still think AI is bad at code."
Analysis: The poll highlights a significant perception gap regarding AI's usefulness in startups. While a large portion sees a divide based on founder engagement, a few believe that AI tools, like Copilot, simply aren't living up to the hype, or that early negative experiences are lingering.
Founder engagement seems key to bridging that gap.
Ready to grow your X audience?
Use SuperX to turn audience insights into action. AI-powered writing, 10M+ viral post ideas, and analytics to track your growth.