@thedankoe asked on X
What did people think of @thedankoe's article?
294 responses analyzed
The responses to @thedankoe's article are a mixed bag, but generally positive. A recent Twitter poll of 294 respondents shows a solid chunk appreciated the content, while others wanted summaries or translations. Here's the breakdown:
| Category | Percentage | Votes |
|---|---|---|
| Positive feedback/Appreciation | 17% | 51 |
| Article summary requests | 9% | 25 |
| Translation requests | 5% | 15 |
| Agreement/Elaboration on ideas | 17% | 49 |
| Made them think about themselves | 2% | 6 |
| Bookmarking/Saving for later | 2% | 7 |
| Critiques of the article's content | 7% | 22 |
Some sample replies reveal the nuances. @Kernzgo said, "Dan, this article on 5D Thinking is excellent, especially the perspective of shifting beliefs from 'identity' to 'upgradable tools.' It precisely addr...", showing clear appreciation. @pngyyn96360561 chimed in with "Massive wake-up call. In the AI era, quality of thought is the only moat left," agreeing with the article's core ideas. Not everyone was sold, though. @userman091101 bluntly asked, "why the fuck are you all clapping for reddit", voicing a critique.
The poll results indicate the article resonated with many, particularly in terms of sparking reflection and agreement on its core concepts, but also highlights a demand for accessibility, in the form of summaries and translations, and the presence of dissenting voices is a reminder that not all content connects with everyone.
Ultimately, the article sparked conversation, introspection, and a desire for broader understanding, showcasing its impact, regardless of individual opinions.
Ready to grow your X audience?
Use SuperX to turn audience insights into action. AI-powered writing, 10M+ viral post ideas, and analytics to track your growth.