@zebassembly asked on X
Kimi K2.5 vs Opus: Is it a Viable Alternative?
79 responses analyzed
It's complicated, but Kimi K2.5 is showing promise as a potential alternative to Opus, though opinions are mixed. A recent Twitter poll by @zebassembly asked users who have tried Kimi K2.5 in opencode to compare it to Opus, and the results were pretty close.
| Option | Percentage | Votes |
|---|---|---|
| Opus is preferred | 19% | 15 |
| Kimi K2.5 is preferred | 18% | 14 |
| Kimi K2.5 is comparable to Opus | 15% | 12 |
| Kimi K2.5 is not a replacement | 3% | 2 |
| Kimi K2.5 is cheaper alternative | 1% | 1 |
| Workflow dependent/Try all | 4% | 3 |
Some users find Kimi K2.5 surprisingly close to Opus in performance. @simongomesc noted, "I think that of all the models that people say can come close to OPUS, this is the one that really give you similar results, not 100% but...", while @SW_Quigley stated, "It's much better than Sonnet 4.5 on long agentic coding sessions 2 to 3 hours and almost as smart as Opus."
However, not everyone is convinced. @madebywelch commented, "Not comparable in my opinion, at least for my workflows. Opus 4.5 feels far superior all around." Others pointed out potential long-term cost issues, with @kellypeilinchan saying, "Cheaper upfront. More expensive long-term when you hit its walls."
Analysis reveals that while Kimi K2.5 might be a contender for some, Opus still holds its ground, especially for specific workflows where its superior performance justifies the cost. The slightly higher preference for Opus suggests that while Kimi K2.5 is good, it may not fully replace Opus in demanding scenarios.
Ultimately, the best model depends on the specific application and budget, so experimentation is key.
Ready to grow your X audience?
Use SuperX to turn audience insights into action. AI-powered writing, 10M+ viral post ideas, and analytics to track your growth.